The opposite exercise, treating proprietary software naming in such an un-generous way, is pretty easy too:

- Fireworks: you'll make bitmaps so good they'll blow up in colors?

- Dreamweaver: you can weave... dreams? I get the 90s web enthusiasm but come on

- Illustrator: there's bitmap illustration and vector illustration; Illustrator focuses on the latter, so good job on picking the wrong word in "vector illustration"

- InDesign: this name is a marketing dept playing it safe to a point that only a beige puddle of non-meaning remains

- GoLive: crappy subscription 1995 online service

- ColdFusion: lol

I'd love to see people taking such critical takes into the bigger guys for once. Especially because they have marketing departments. F/LOSS project naming reflects their often-personal origins and ways of expressing identity. Some do sound clunky, but give me the clumsy Inkscape any day (the "ksk" is hard to get used to, but you forget quickly) than any of the sad corporate names above.

I'm being snarkier that warranted, but man i'm crestfallen with all the unbridled hate on free software project naming around here.