because they didn't need the MBA for the roles they did land
its all part of one contiguous complete thought
its all part of one contiguous complete thought
> the connections resulted in no improved professional access or ability to exchange time for food and shelter.
When you make such broad statements, then walk them back in comments downstream, it makes conversation unfruitful.
“improved” is the operative word that you seem to ignore or view as contradictory
the MBA did not improve their work prospects, they already had work prospects. you asked for a clarification, you call the clarification backtracking
do you have an actual opinion on the topic now that its more clear for you