Refusing to add a new canary past the expiration date has the same effect, but is only done through inaction.
Refusing to add a new canary past the expiration date has the same effect, but is only done through inaction.
I am not a lawyer, but my understanding is that this is the stated legal opinion of the lawyers at the EFF.
>- a declaration that, up to that point, no warrants have been served, nor have any searches or seizures taken place
>- a cut and paste headline from a major news source, establishing date
>Special note should be taken if these messages ever cease being updated, or are removed from this page.
>The current message is here:
...and then it goes blank.
But if you had a script doing so, which is likely the case, you would have to modify it or direct it to stop updating, which would be a violation again.
I don’t think it’ll be that cut and dry as others have stated articulately.
> The government can't compel your speech
That’s not true. The United States government can compel your speech, albeit in very limited cases.