Hacker News Reader

Comment by h0l0cube | Hacker News Reader

Could even switch over to Bandit which was on a recent Thinking Elixir podcast

> In recent performance tests, Bandit's HTTP/1.x engine is up to 5x faster than Cowboy depending on the number of concurrent requests. When comparing HTTP/2 performance, Bandit is up to 2.3x faster than Cowboy

https://github.com/mtrudel/bandit

View on HN

I don't think that 1.7 is going to really have bandit fully supported on launch: https://github.com/phoenixframework/phoenix/pull/5071

Once it is supported though, I will be on that for sure.

The PR you linked to adds support for generating new phx apps with the relevant change already incorporated; it’s just a generator change. We’re waiting a bit to incorporate this change to ‘soft launch’ Bandit support.

Bandit author here. We’re fully supported on phx 1.7+; it’s a one line change to your existing app, described on the Bandit readme!

That’s a great point and Phoenix 1.7 is the first release to support the usage of other web servers.

2-5x speed up would make Erlang surprise Java/Go/etc.

https://stressgrid.com/blog/webserver_benchmark/

Bandit is written in pure Elixir which is a bit undesirable to integrate with pure Erlang projects. From what I gleaned off the podcast, it's a subset of the HTTP features available in Cowboy, specifically those that are available on the Phoenix side, and cleaving off the unused functionality realized much of the performance benefit.

Bandit author here. Correct! The byline of Bandit is ‘a web server for Plug applications’ and being able to focus on that narrowed set of requirements is a large part of where the perf boost comes from (less code, easier to reason about, fewer processes, etc).

Reply on news.ycombinator.com