If the mainstream media and the state didn't lose trust then why would people turn to less credible sources? Because everyone is dumb/crazy? If that is the conclusion people are coming to it seems rather harsh and elitist in my opinion.
With regard to HCQ, the evidence supporting its use was from small scale studies and not reproducible (hence why Fox News's take was misinformation); however, there was evidence that it improved survivability, especially in some less-developed countries, so saying "no evidence" or even "bogus" like MSNBC did was also misinformation.
(Personal theory: Comorbodity of COVID and other conditions HCQ is effective against was a confounding factor in less-developed countries; and the remaining delta is due to HCQ's immunosuppressant qualities calming the cytokine storm.)
Ivermectin has a long history of safe and beneficial usage in the developing world, billions of doses. Yet it was actively discouraged as "horse medicine" here. Anyone with experience or relatives in the developing world would immediately question the veracity of such a discouragement.
It was called horse medicine because the unfortunate people that fell for the kooks resorted to vet sources for it because doctors correctly refused.
I can’t believe the revisionist history on this.