These people deserve to get smacked down in court, and I hope they get fucked with the legal fees. They're misers, and contribute nothing to society.
These people deserve to get smacked down in court, and I hope they get fucked with the legal fees. They're misers, and contribute nothing to society.
Yes that is one of the bad reasons. Put up "private property" posts or similar. If you have such an enormous plot of private land that you cannot manage to enforce a stranger sticking their toe out onto it, and you for some reason really need to enforce to that extent-- that is on you. Consider scaling down your private property.
As for hunting on private property, that seems to a separate issue from the concept of landlocked public land. That's practically a guns issue. Anyway, that doesn't give private property owners dominion over public land.
In fact, I didn't read of a single good reason.
I don't see why you need to change the narrative to be "OH WOE IS ME, THEY TOUCHED THINE PUBLIC, but pissed on thine private a bit". That can be charged with evidence.
People MAYBE doing a crime is not a crime, and is a fucked up premise for you to persue, I'm disappointed in you.
I hate to break it to you - the govt can define walking paths and public lines.
It's going to be difficult to hold anything resembling a conversation with someone that seems to have missed the key points of the article, if it was read at all. Enjoy the rest of your day.
Do you want to fuck people up before they commit a crime? DO YOU WANT TO CHARGE TRESPASSING BEFORE THEY TRESPASS?
Several civil rights movements have logged in to see what happens next.
It's an article worth reading, that's all I'm saying.
This seems like there’s some shenanigans going for landowners who want to avoid property taxes by only buying part of public land.