> "Without the man in the photo, the photo of this man wouldn’t exist."
I get what it means in the context of the article, and it's a good point, but still I can't help noticing... that's true of all men in all photos.
I get what it means in the context of the article, and it's a good point, but still I can't help noticing... that's true of all men in all photos.
Maybe it should have been, "Without the man in this photo, digital photos of a man wouldn't exist."
Or am I not understanding?