An unexpected ass kicking (2012)
impossiblehq.com
impossiblehq.com
Imagining a thing and then spending a lifetime making it a reality is not the same as wanting to get rich or famous. It's not even obliquely related to the drive for success. In fact it's a failure mode. It's an intellectual pursuit that might make you wealthy, but probably won't, because wealth and acclaim are orthogonal to satisfying your own curiosity.
I am trying to realign my pursuits and sense of fulfillment by focusing on what “feels right” rather than be manipulated by monetary concerns. I certainly don’t want or need to strive for tons of money; the only way I’ve justified the path is by somehow having faith that whatever I naturally involve myself with will find it’s way in supporting itself to conclusion.
I’ve always wondered how “the greats” supported themselves. You only hear about their intellectual pursuits but not their support system.
I’m not sure who it was but in the area of thermodynamics Faraday or someone was basically supporting his entire family on a farm and just working on the profundity of heat in his spare hours.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russell_Kirsch
"Without the man in the photo, the photo of this man wouldn’t exist."
I get what it means in the context of the article, and it's a good point, but still I can't help noticing... that's true of all men in all photos.
Maybe it should have been, "Without the man in this photo, digital photos of a man wouldn't exist."
Or am I not understanding?
An Unexpected Ass Kicking - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4342790 - Aug 2012 (196 comments)
Worth reading just for that
In the same way, someone else probably would have invented the digital image scanner.
https://jorgenveisdal.medium.com/einstein-and-hilberts-race-...
That's hard to do in practice. The internet has made it clear to me that "Nothing new under the sun" has always been true. Almost every "original" idea that I have had I wind up finding having already been carried out by someone else first.
I believe however that original thinking is still a good thing to embrace although I am not sure that sitting down and saying to yourself, "Okay, now think of something to do that has never been done before" is a fruitful way to approach brainstorming. Original ideas seem to come about a little more organically (if they come at all).
> Nothing is withheld from us which we have conceived to do.
I like that one better. In general I like Kirsch's lamenting that we have become a flock of consumers rather than of creators. I feel so much better at least when I build/make things, not so good when I spend a stretch of evenings just consuming entertainment (doom scrolling, whathaveyou). I am on the fence though as to whether that is a new phenomena or whether that is somehow related to our seemingly modern entertainment culture.
To be sure there must have always been people unmotivated to create, build. But perhaps before radio, television, the internet, those same people at least would have wandered outside and knocked a baseball around, or looked for crawdads, or dropped sticks into a creek to watch them float away like small boats.
Context is everything.
If something has already been done it's not the end of the world. If you think it has value you should do it again and try to collect its leftover potential
Eg I first encountered "blockchain" ca. 1995, but that took a while to become popular.
Turned out pretty well in the end.