I’m curious if anyone has read this bokk. This part of the summary sounds must interesting:
> Shows why scientific method, rigour, and objectivity are individually, or in combination, insufficient to support scientific reliability
> Shows why scientific method, rigour, and objectivity are individually, or in combination, insufficient to support scientific reliability
https://web.archive.org/web/20210413173809/https://www.arist...
from one of the authors, which you might or might not find useful.