[flagged]
It's almost as if they realize that posting a wall of links will daunt most into not questioning them, even if most of the links wouldn't survive a hint of scrutiny.
Graphs from EU data about excess mortality are conspiracy theories now?
They did read it, and concluded it wasn't useful.
> Graphs from EU data about excess mortality are conspiracy theories now?
Excess mortality, by design, does not say anything about causes. In the USA for example, you can hypothesize a variety of plausible reasons for continued high excess mortality, pandemic-related and otherwise (increased crime, lower incomes, decreased access to non-Covid healthcare, increased highway speeds, et alia), but the excess mortality number itself cannot tell you the relative strengths of those causes.
Response was few minutes after post. No wonder that answer is not even related to content of links.
With things like electronic health records, insurance claims databases, and state vaccine registries; it is trivial to check whether or not someone who is admitted to a hospital for COVID hot a vaccine or not.
Arguing that the COVID vaccines we have available in the US are not effective is like arguing that the average global temperature has not increased over the last 50 years, or that smoking does not increase the risk of lung cancer and emphysema. You are making extraordinary claims that contradict a mountain of data.