“By running many simulations over three main scenarios of climate until 2050 and 2100 — the so-called Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), we show that there will be up to 34% more co-extinctions overall by 2100 than are predicted from direct effects alone,” Dr. Strona says.
Nothing that you wrote makes those simulations correct.
>>.. interlink with other factors to predict a pattern of coextinctions..
How do they know these links are correct? They do not, and can not.
>> By running many simulations ...
So they themselves admit that they don't know which simulation is correct, or in other words, they silently admit they have no idea. So if they compute 1000 different scenarios then:
a) How do they know any of those is correct?
b) If you have 1k scenarios to choose from how do you know which one is correct?
You cannot.
>> ... over three main scenarios ...
How do they know there will be only 3? Cannot know that. Nothing guarantuess that these 3 will happen, uncompultable.
>> we show that there will be up to 34% more co-extinctions..
Imagine being so naive you actualy state it to a 1% accuracy lmao.
You can't even predict a double pendulum after a second or two: nature is trillions of double pendulums in a chain: you must be delusional to think you can predict that!