And the questions are as inarticulate / ambiguous as you'd expect from a "political" or "social sciences" quiz:
17. "It is a small group that consciously and secretly controls the world."
Like, controls all of it? They control the whole world? Obviously disagree, a no brainer.
Or a relatively small group of humans has an outsized impact on human affairs? Obviously agree, again, a no brainer but in the opposite direction.
The question could be made more meaningful by better framing: What's "small"? What kind of "control"? How "secret"? What are you really asking?
I wish there was an option "None of the above – the question is ill posed, and I try to not partake in sloppy thinking". The "Neutral / Hesitant" option hardly covers it.
18. "The right to be anonymous on Internet should be guaranteed".
Guaranteed by whom, how? What does this even mean?
Taking the test I feel like I'm trying to read the test authors' mind, rather than probing my own.
I'm not sure what the AI makes of it, but I doubt the test authors really took into account that it's mostly a coin toss between "Strongly agree" and "Strongly disagree" (or "Neutral hesitant"?), even on the same question for the same person.
Or maybe I'm just not the target audience, the sloppiness is an intentional self-selection ruse.