Hacker News Reader

"Clearly" isn't an argument.

Your second sentence is even worse. The pertinent point is that you'd be interfering with his preferred choice to work on mIRC.

Again, this is very debatable.

View on HN

Your comment isn't an argument either. All it says is "One can argue..." without actually providing the argument.

It's easy to find such arguments using google, e.g. search "are slave contracts enforceable." Also look into the theory of contract law regarding what terms are enforceable and what not, and why. There's a whole range of legal theories and arguments.

This isn’t a slave contract. He can just… stop releasing updates and move on with life.

The actual debate is over whether it's debatable. It is very debatable. It's beside the point whether it is or is not a slave contract.

Then don't introduce the term in to the conversation. You're shockingly dishonest in your rhetoric by doing so. To quote you before:

> One can argue that the original contract is tantamount to a slave contract, thereby null and void at the outset.

You have a reading disability, trying to pinpoint precisely where will likely only serve illustrate it further.

"You're shockingly dishonest"

Are your panties truly in a bunch over this thread, or are you just feigning your "shock"? It matters not; either is laughable.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com