> complaining about how everything should be "easy"

Not the worst thing to complain about.

Things that ought to be easy should be easy, so that time can be spent on solving hard problems.

T_PAAMAYIM_NEKUDOTAYIM is an example of something easy made deliberately hard. Thousands of people had to search for it (it adds up in the aggregate).

And not only that, now there's mundane debates around whether or not it was a bad idea (such as right here, but also in the linked article). Further waste of time.

Could've all been avoided.

Because programming languages are tools, and tools should be as simple as possible, and as complex as they have to be.

It's not the tools job to be needlessly complex. Tools exist so we can build complex things with them.

It’s not that hard, right. Nothing is really hard when an explanation is one search keyword away. But even a little bit becomes an issue when you fed up. This has nothing to do with skills and intelligence, the argument is emotional. If you don’t get fed up bit by bit in our profession or you work at the place where you have plenty of time to digest anything irrelevant, lucky you.

How is writing things in random languages "intellectual" ?

If I replace a random λέξη[0] in my comments with its equivalent in another language for no reason, is someone being "anti-intellectual" for thinking that's silly?

[0]: "λέξη" means "word" in Greek.

> Again with the anti-intellectualism and laziness.

Knowing that a two-word phrase in Hebrew maps to :: does not make you an intellectual, it means you know a bit of trivia.