It's so unreliable! All they have to avoid is invading their neighbors, but they couldn't manage that. Russia is the unreliable party.
For Russia (and many Russia apologists) Ukraine is not an innocent neighbor or not even a neighbor in the first place (not a "real country", part of mother Russia, part of the empire or part of the legitimate sphere of influence, legitimate by destiny...), and Russia is liberating Ukrainians from their current leaders or at least liberate the Russian speaking subset of the population.
Clearly if you're not sharing this worldview/framing it seems clear that Russia is just paying the obvious consequences for their actions, and that they are morally on breach of contract.
Unfortunately in practice the contract doesn't matter. There are no courts, there are no normal arguments to be had here.
Russia made a choice and are bearing the consequence. Other countries made their choices and are bearing the consequence.
Some gambles have been made, some have failed, others have not yet played out fully.
But I can't ignore the fact that it works on some people.
Also, once a person holds a POV aligned with that propaganda, having a discussion with another person that has another POV is extremely difficult unless the two parties are at least aware of each other's fundamentally different points of view.
But you can’t deny no diplomatic attempts were made to prevent the conflict by either party. I’m not putting all the blame on one side, that’s a gross oversimplification.
Being a stalwart defender of 'free-dam & deee-mocracy' the US shrugs and says ' Oh well. It was the will of the people. Nothing we can do about it'
</Jackanory>
So, you’re either against all the wars, or you’re a hypocrite. There was no reason for Azerbaijan to restart the Karabakh conflict. But MasterCard and Visa still work in Baku.
Not saying that what’s happening in Ukraine is good, but let’s not pretend. According the to the West, there’re “good” and “bad” wars.