Twitter officers conspired with rogue elements of the US government to defraud US citizens of their constitutionally protected rights.
This is not a game. The people involved should be facing 30 year prison sentences.
If twitter bans me for spamming, do you think I can sue them?
They abused technology designed to prevent the spread of child pornography to censor information harmful to their preferred political candidate at the behest of government officials.
Do we know what they contained? Were they threats? Spam? Copyright infringing? Disagreements about tax policy?
It actually can not.
The dude behind you with a pipe in his hand asks for your car keys in the parking lot.
Is that ok? He just asked is all…
United States citizens have explicit rights, and corporate employees colluding with government officials to “voluntarily” nullify those rights are guilty of conspiracy to defraud the United States
The government represents us, a collusion to defeat our rights is conspiracy against us and subject to civil and criminal action
Could you describe the government at the time this action was taken? What relationship did the people asking Twitter to do things with the government? Did the people making the requests have any authority to direct any department of the Federal Government to take any action?
They committed conspiracy to defraud the United States, and will in due time be charged as such by the Department of Justice.
State employees who participated are traitors.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual...
Would be curious on your take of what DeSantis was trying to do to Disney in FL? 30 years in prison for threatening Disney about its speech?
https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ron-desantiss-military...
For what crime, specifically?
> The general conspiracy statute, 18 U.S.C. § 371, creates an offense "[i]f two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose.
https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm/criminal-resource-manual...
"The intent required for a conspiracy to defraud the government is that the defendant possessed the intent (a) to defraud, (b) to make false statements or representations to the government or its agencies in order to obtain property of the government, or that the defendant performed acts or made statements that he/she knew to be false, fraudulent or deceitful to a government agency, which disrupted the functions of the agency or of the government."
What false statements/representations were made, by anyone?
In addition, they had to in some way "defraud the United States" which is: "They cheat the government out of money or property; They interfere or obstruct legitimate Government activity; or They make wrongful use of a governmental instrumentality." - None of which apply.
For example, a teacher hired at a school cannot argue that they could not be expected to teach.
Much in the same way, a government employee cannot in good faith argue that they cannot be expected to uphold the constitution.
By secretly colluding with private companies (that the government has failed to regulate, I might add) to suppress otherwise constitutionally protected activity government employees are criminally liable
Bigly constitutional