This is kind of a "the entire industry is dumb" assumption.
I mean, sometimes industries are dumb, and there are certainly people driving oversized vehicles on the road right now, but if you can find places to optimize vehicle weight outside of the engine/transmission/fuel you're replacing with batteries/motors, that applies to regular old semi-trucks; if you can make a semi-truck weigh 5000 lbs less without compromising on its design parameters, you can make every other semi-truck on the road more fuel efficient and save like 6% of your fuel costs, while also allowing you to haul bigger loads than competitors' trucks.
Everyone making semi-trucks is interested in that, not just Tesla.
I'm fairly confident some of the rest of the industry could get a comparable weight if they started from scratch and they optimized for EV only. But that's two assumptions that don't currently hold.
So, 10,000+ pounds for the power pack alone is a sizable chunk of the maximum allowable weight, and could potentially eat into the allowance for cargo, more so for restricted routes like older inner city bridges with tight weight limits and the like.
[0]https://www.jdpower.com/cars/shopping-guides/how-much-does-a...
[0]: https://afdc.energy.gov/laws/11682
> NGVs and PEVs may exceed the federal maximum gross vehicle weight limit for comparable conventional fuel vehicles by up to 2,000 pounds (lbs.). The NGV or PEV must not exceed a maximum gross vehicle weight of 82,000 lbs. (Reference Public Law 116-6 and 23 U.S. Code 127(s))
e.g. a CAT D8T bulldozer weighs in at over 80,000lbs all on its own and they are often trucked around as a complete unit, so you're looking at 20-35,000 more for the trailer and tractor to haul it. Heavier pieces of equipment like D9's (108,000#) or D10's (145,000#) are generally 2-3 loads of chassis/tracks/blade&attachments.
Apparently the highway patrol would camp out in the industrial/shipping areas and watch for compressed suspensions/bulging tire sidewalls on big trucks as a monthly fundraising exercise.
Obviously there's a business incentive to move as much as you possibly can at once...
I am unhappy with this description. An overloaded truck is a safety issue, and also a long term road-wear issue.
Sure, except this fundraising didn't stop the activity. It just took a cut from the profits, and the vehicles drove off AIUI. This was Illinois in the late 80s-early 90s I'm talking about...
Some states have higher weight limits when the ground is frozen.
There were about 10-12 concrete barriers as load in the demo each weighing 39,000lbs. So the weight being carried is around 40ishK lbs. So rough approximation - half the weight of the truck is load and half is the truck itself.
I don't work in the industry. I just observe three things:
1) the weight variance of a semi encompasses the amount imputed to the battery
2) 3,000lb of weight can be saved by not having a diesel engine plus another 2,000lb not having fuel. (Both of which will be in the total gross weight of the semi) some of which will of course be replaced by electric motors.
3) it's a speculative weight. It might also not weigh that much. Might is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
A fourth point: trucks routinely travel partly empty because of weight distribution issues. Not every TEU is full.
Logistics is fascinating. TCO is the closest most computer scientists get to "how can owning a Mac be cheaper than owning a Windows PC" but logistics does this almost every sum. Weight and carry capacity may not be the sole deciding factor here when a semi is worth $500k and has a 2nd hand value and is a finance decision with tail costs and operation costs.
A full semi can have 300 gallons of diesel which itself is about 2000 pounds, so we're down to a 9,000 pound difference.
And some percentage are short haul, which are often not even near to fully loaded. Could be as high as 40-50%.