I agree, but it's more complex than both of those. If something matters to you, but matters a lot more to the company, it's probably a good idea to do what's good for the company. And if it matters a lot to you and not much to the company, it's probably right to do what you want.

When things meet in the middle it means you have to take lot of other things into account, too, to make the decision.

These hollow 1-way maps don't ever give good advice.

That's not a controversial heading though.

I probably wouldn't have read the article, because no shit, that would be obvious