Source? As of April the CDC “recommends against the use of ivermectin for the treatment of COVID-19, except in clinical trials” [1].
[1] https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/therapies/ant...
Ivermectin among drugs that failed avoiding hospitalization for COVID-19 patients - study: https://www.jpost.com/health-and-wellness/coronavirus/articl...
COVID-19 Treatments and Medications: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/your-health/treatm...
Effectiveness of N95 Masks against SARS-CoV-2: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chas.1c00016
Twitter isn't Congress, and the TOS are clear and exist for a very good reason. Now Elon has reinvented... TOS. And claims you have a right to free speech, but not of reach... which is exactly what deboosting and shadowbanning are. He's even planning to have an "algorithm" (another memey buzz word to rail against) to prioritize replies. He's reinvented the status quo, all in the name of a boogeyman that never existed.
https://www.factcheck.org/2022/11/fda-did-not-change-positio...
Sounds like you were lead astray. I suppose in a certain way it might seem that they didn't censor it fast enough, to prevent people like you from being misled and then spreading that inaccurate information on other news sites, no?
They couldn’t keep their story straight so they resorted to censorship even going so idiotically far as censoring their previous science (actually opinion). (The follow the science mantra wasn’t at all about following science but imposing belief)
Assigning malicious intent is disingenuous.
"Horse Dewormer" is itself an epithet. It's meant to discredit something that is actually prescribed to people and also tested for efficacy in fighting Covid itself.
But, if you wish, then do we suppress all non-intended uses of medications out there or only the ones you disagree with?