Hacker News Reader

Comment by baxtr | Hacker News Reader

These seem to be “just” phone numbers. Most of which probably already leaked through the last Facebook leak. Not sure how significant the data is.

View on HN

That’s not leak actually, phone information about active/inactive is open. Anybody can run a spider to collect this.

You can check whith your own cellphone, if a phone number have a Whatsapp account, without any hacker knowledge, this is not significant at all.

That mostly seems to be what they did lol!

“ 2. Only Verified Whatsapp Numbers - Country Wise ( This is to cover all the mobile subscribers exhaustively . We generate mobile numbers based teh series allocated for the telecom operators in each countries and then verify / validate those numbers with the Whatsapp Servers )”

> this is not significant at all.

I wonder if HN community would say same if Telegram data was leaked in a similar way

I might be missing something here. Why would HN care any differently about WhatsApp vs Telegram?

Probably he is referring to that WhatsApp is from a US company vs telegram with Russian origin.

general tendency in HN is Telegram bad, Signal/WhatsApp is good. Even small mistake made by Telegram will be judged harshly, when it comes to WhatsApp, their mistakes are not important.

Yes I am a Telegram fanboy (how can you not like such a beautiful/fast app, in the Electron world where everything takes 10s of seconds to load)

Signal seems like a pretty light/fast/good electron app (on windows at least)?

WhatsApp chats are end-to-end encrypted (even their iCloud backups are). Telegram group messages are always plaintext / available to Telegram, and Telegram 1:1 direct messages are plaintext by default.

Yet they hold the encryption keys to decrypt your chats on the fly. What inspires so much trust in Meta? Especially in a company with "targeted advertisements" as its business?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com