“Slippery slope” is generally a poor argument, especially without strong evidence regarding it’s existence.
If they fuck this up and piss off their customers, that’ll just mean that BMW or VAG will take the sales instead.
If they fuck this up and piss off their customers, that’ll just mean that BMW or VAG will take the sales instead.
The used market will probably demand to know if this was ever enabled so they can pay less for your abused car.
The used market will probably bypass cars with heated seat subscriptions (at least where it gets cold) to the point where they have to make it permanent just to keep the trade in value high enough that the old owner can afford the next car.
You should learn to read and understand English before making yourself look like a complete idiot by autistically screeching about fallacies.
I’ll hold your hand: Not all slippery slopes are fallacious, I never suggested that the one presented earlier was. I suggested that without supporting evidence it’s a weak argument, that’s strictly different than calling it an outright fallacy.
You’re just demonstrating that you don’t even know what ad hominem means.
“edgyquant is an idiot; therefore he is wrong” is an example of an ad hominem.
“edgyquant is an idiot” is merely a statement of fact
How does it feel being so pathetic that you have to substitute “insult” with “ad hominem” in a desperate attempt to seem smart?
The world will be a better place once you’re diagnosed with a terminal illness, hopefully that day arrives soon.