The odds of some group out of millions of people, on some day out of ten thousand since the incident, finding some piece of debris out of thousands, are considerably higher.
This is the multiple-endpoints fallacy. You only notice the events that happened after the fact, you never notice everything that doesn't happen.
This is why it is dumb when people say "The odds against life arising at random is astronomical."
It did happen, therefore, the convoluted path to life wasn't what the skeptic speaker thinks it was.
Multiple-endpoints fallacy and overly anthropomorphizing reality also makes a fool out of the Drake Equation, and the idea of "The Great Filter" is dumb too.
But I'm not so sure about that last. The Drake equation and Great Filter do handle the multiple-endpoints question correctly. They ask, with so many possible occurrences in the scale of the universe, why don't we see any of them?