Hacker News Reader

An animal has a ton of data input.

Eyes, ears, nerves across your skin, group behavior, parents etc.

This to comprehend (alone the visual) is gigantic.

A brain also has an architecture which is NOT similar to what gpt-3 does

Alone the difference in how brains train alone is huge.

> An animal has a ton of data input.

> Eyes, ears, nerves across your skin ...

We have a limited but adequate amount of input, across very few domains. (I can't even see backwards.)

> ... group behavior, parents etc.

That's not sensory input?

I would argue it is. You need to see your parent and feel it and it's not random noise it's a grouping of different inputs.

Something which got doesn't has.

But you can give that another name if you like.