Having a real person / entity tied to the posts seems pretty reasonable to me and doesn’t have much to do with free speech.
Having a real person / entity tied to the posts seems pretty reasonable to me and doesn’t have much to do with free speech.
Free speech absolutism does nothing to fight spam, impersonation for sake of parody, or bots. So whatever he says, this ain't free speech absolutism.
We won't stop criticizing Musk. It's our right to criticize him. With great power comes great responsibility, and he's completely failing at responsible stewardship of the alleged "town square" that he just bought. I've lost count of how many times he's changed course on verification in the, what, two weeks since he bought it? He's earned heaping disdain and ridicule.
And two of my friends are getting fired because they live in cities without a twitter hq to drive to. Yeah. People hate that for some reason. Weird.
Here's a whole gallery of people exercising free speech through impersonation in physical town squares across the country:
https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo/trump-impersonator.html
Twitter doesn't allow that. Why?