Change for fashion sake and nothing that users have been asking for, sums up all development out of Mozilla at the moment.
Change for fashion sake and nothing that users have been asking for, sums up all development out of Mozilla at the moment.
UI is the part of software most prone to fashion. Fashions go in and out, and UIs and their usability goes in and out with them. I would rather stick to a usable, well-known UI than have TB be trendy and strictly worse, like the "flat everything" fad, or the "you don't need options" fad, or the "header bar" fad.
Edit: Taking a further look into the history, it looks like the project has been under a lot of turmoil WRT shutting down and being revived. Explains why I have avoided it for so long.
I don't even use IMAP, nor calendar. I download from POP3 servers and use the calendar on my phone instead.
If they get to a point where Android and Desktop Thunderbird have email, contacts and calendars synced, with a UI that's as nice as this mock it will be fantastic.
The type of person who cares about that will not be using it anyway. Trying to be hip is how firefox when from 30% market share to 3%. Stop going after people who don't care but are very loud.
The fact that you are indifferent (as am I) is a good thing as far as I'm concerned.. They've made it more attractive to new users and also haven't alienated their existing user base.
Its a really old UI style from the 1990s and I am not seeing anything in this suggesting that will change. People will very quickly realise it does not behave in a modern way once they try to use it.
Like if someone cares enough to report an issue, they're probably invested and will stick around. If they didn't care, they wouldn't bother to report the issue.
You need to fix the issues that cause people to just give up and go elsewhere - the issues that don't get opened!
I'm not sure what really changed here. Maybe I should try and see it, but... really, I wish they'd just copied Google Calendar UI completely, making it an offline copy. Surely it's not perfect, but it was so, so much more fluent the last I tried. I mean, for me, it kinda did everything I wanted to, the only problem I ever had with it was that it's Google.
Thunderbird's calendar redesign brings it in line with what customers expect from a calendar app and make it more user friendly.
So, a bunch of text with the content you want/need and a photo?
And we replaced that with multi-megabyte javascripts, autoplaying video ads, floating bars, breaking infinite scroll, breaking ajax, refresh that returns you to another page, not-working "back" buttons, popups asking to signup for a newsletter, to register, to fill out a survey, cookie popups, a bunch of sliders to disable all of them, notificiation request popups, location requests, etc?
Yeah, i like even this:
https://www.spacejam.com/1996/
a lot more than:
https://twitter.com/elonmusk is 8.5mb, two bottom bars (accept cookies and login/signin), and after scrolling a page and a half down, i get a popup forcing me to login/signup.
Even relatively empty google is 1.8mb
This page (HN) is one of the few, that are not bloated, and allow you to read stuff without giving your personal data.
You mean, like the one we are all reading right now?
At least for news sites yes, please.
SerenityOS has a better UI than all other Linux distributions. 90s inspired. So yes I guess?
Not only Linux DEs are to blame here, Windows does it to (sometimes). Probably all stemming form the handicapped mobile interfaces.