Hacker News Reader

Comment by nradov | Hacker News Reader

The only thing I’ve seen attempting to give legitimacy to tokenization is the pruf protocol.

Why is low-effort bait like this being upvoted? Do people seriously want to have another off-topic flame war? It's like people are compelled to upvote generic sarcasm. Extremely disappointing.

I get that it's simple, but at this stage, it's hard for me to suggest that it isn't true? It strikes me as presently generally accurate.

Because it is accurate

I agree but it's noise and has nothing to do with the topic. Why do you want to encourage that instead of actually discussing the article?

I was glad to see it flagged and dead after my comment, but then someone even vouched for it. Like it's such an important comment that it needs to be heard. Even the premise is questionable (does quality presuppose it is moral?) but it's obvious what the parent means and commenting on it is just bait.

The article is about the low-quality implementation of platforms selling NFTs. I don't see how discussing the lack of quality of NFTs themselves, the "product" they sell, falls too far off the tree.

That's a really far-fetched and generous interpretation. The comment is obviously just sarcastic NFT bashing, picking up on the lowest denominator in the parent comment and not talking about the platform or article at all. Come on, we can do better. Instigating another generic NFT flame war is pointless and off-topic.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com