Long covid is real and scary. So are cancer, heart attacks and car crashes, but it would be a really bad idea to skip a cost/benefit analysis of the possible counter measures available at societal level because of that.
Compare that with 1.6 million people getting a cancer diagnosis every year, about 40 thousand traffic fatalities and 2.2 million injured in traffic accidents.
The traffic injuries and fatalities are from Wikipedia [2].
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/20/podcasts/the-daily/long-c...
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in...
There has been relatively little in the media about the cognitive/neurological costs of covid to our society. If you get covid and your "sickness" is over in a week or two and you go back to work but you've had 15 points knocked off your IQ for half a year, what is the true cost of that to an entire civilization when scaled up to the whole planet?
Given the choice between having had covid and living under an authoritarian regime for the last three years, I'd have chosen the latter.
What indeed? It's not 0. It's not infinite. But the cost of trying to reduce covid (and hence long covid) cases to 0 is infinite. It's a hard problem and entirely unclear where we should draw the line.
I truly do hope you (and all other affected) will get better.
Western leaders aren't doing any cost/benefit analysis at all - except to their political career.
We have a range of very low-cost, technological measures avaliable. For exampme upgrading schools with proper ventillation. We have scientific studies that show this would reduce likelihood of infection for everythint, from COVID to common cold. It would reduce CO2 concentrations in classrooms and help children be more alert and awake. There has been zero budget allocated to them.
In London I have seen UV sterilisation installed on handrails of the escalators, and ROI on that will be mostly zero.
I don't think that arbitrarily confining the population (under the threat of violence) is a valid perspective.
Every time they do, people are refusing to wear a simple mask and are putting them at risk. There is always a guy that is obviously ill and is coughing all over the place.
Like if you go to a nightclub ill, whatever, everyone is there by choice. But visiting a government establishments is a legal obligation.
Why is it that if you go into my house uninvited, fall onto a ditch and break your leg, I could be held responsible, but if I cought at your face on purpose to infect you, noone is at fault.
Why is it at least not a social norm to kick out sick and unmasked people from public institutions?
Because we have some really fucked up laws that should not exist. Go argue with the government
>"Why is it at least not a social norm to kick out sick and unmasked people from public institutions?"
Because The Socium does not want to have this norm. Might be unfair to some but who says the life is. As for your particular case - it is better if we try to build society where we do not need to go to a fucking passport office.
And lock up everyone immunocompromised for life, because we can't stomach the inconvenience of putting on a mask when we are sick.