Hacker News Reader

Comment by withinboredom | Hacker News Reader

I mean, you can prompt me (or any other engineer) to spit out copyrighted code. FizzBuzz comes to mind… as do a number of algorithms I’ve written in the past which belongs to my past employers…

I really think we are entering some interesting territory that will likely be an interesting can of worms.

View on HN

There is somehow something different if you knew the entire code to quickbooks from memory, and had an api where I could request any 10-line chunk of it I wanted, as many times as I wanted.

So you’re saying that how fast someone can type and how well they can recall makes a difference? I don’t type over 120 words per min like my grandma, but I have a photographic memory. I can tell you what file & line a chunk of code belongs to, or spit it out verbatim, customized to the current problem I’m working on.

So, you’re saying I can’t work in this industry? That seems a bit harsh.

> So, you’re saying I can’t work in this industry? That seems a bit harsh.

If you're going to be spitting copyrighted code out in violation of any licenses it might be made available under… yes, you can't. Most employers would not appreciate that behaviour. But I doubt you actually do this, even though you're capable of it. You reason about your code; you're not just being a predictive text engine.

It sounds like for you in particular, yes, since you seem to want to go out of your way to find any way to violate copyright, even when the terms are intentionally generous. Indeed such a person should not work in this industry, though I'm sure there are plenty of employers who are happy to have you steal for them, so you will be able to regardless.

My point was that we all do this /not on purpose/ (and for me being an exception, can make sure I don’t personally). But when I see code that existed in another company with some variables changed, I don’t flag it. There are only so many ways to describe a chair, are they all copyrighted?

"My point was that we all do this /not on purpose/"

I don't concede the equivalence.

It's really simple. If you are outputting licensed code and not abiding by the terms of the license, then yes, that is a problem.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com