There are images and video embeds and URL previews on tweets. There are fraudulent and abusive users who are trying to spam the user base. There are users whose threat model includes ‘will be attacked by the concerted cyber-offensive capabilities of sophisticated nation states’, as well as ‘will be cyber-bullied by the collective force of 8chan’, or ‘will be cyber-stalked by legions of k-pop stans’. Not clear which of those is more dangerous.
The SEC considers statements made on Twitter by corporate officers and company accounts to be material disclosures. Tweets are embedded in New York Times and bbc news articles. Courts take Twitter messages as evidence. Law enforcement organizations throughout the world have frequent interest in finding out what activity users have had on the platform.
And on top of that, it’s trying to run an ad business that takes that firehose of craziness and turns it into a marketable stream of attention that can be sold to advertisers.
Don’t downplay what Twitter does as ‘just moving 280 character messages’. It’s way, way more than that.
Twitter is -currently- hundreds of millions of messages daily. Whether or not it stays that high, we'll see...
Twitter yesterday was about 7500?
Twitter’s reliability record is pretty impressive these days. Last major outage was July 14?
Remember a few months back when Facebook had to break into their own data center with axes to get back online?
Twitter is still worth it for the 280 chars. Sure video and images and 27/4 availability are desireable, but not essential
Building and maintaining a distributed system like Twitter is far from easy, as any one of the talks their engineers have given and papers they've written should tell you.
Let's at least base this discussion on realistic and reasonable determinations of the company and its operations.
how is it distributed?