In human societies we have a spectrum of approaches to settling disagreements. The most peaceful being dialogue, and the most aggressive being violence in the form of terrorism and war.

Environmentalists have tried dialogue for literal decades at this point and it has accomplished basically nothing. Escalating to threatening property rights seems the lowest possible escalation, and seems only natural from the perspective that climate change is an existential threat.

While I do not think that these strategies will be successful, I also think that calling them moral toddlers for it is dishonest.