Tags are better but can turn out to be even harder (for similar reasons, amplified combinatorially).
Labels are the most practical. The GMail inventor was genius. Folders must begone (except for system files).
Tags are better but can turn out to be even harder (for similar reasons, amplified combinatorially).
Labels are the most practical. The GMail inventor was genius. Folders must begone (except for system files).
"Tag" — if I understand GP's point — implies some structure. In the above examples, it would rather be "ByLocation::Planet Earth::Europe::Netherlands::Amsterdam", "BySubject::Animals::Dogs::Amsterdam(MyNeighborsDog)", and "MyProjects::ByYear::2021::ProjectOnAmsterdamStreet" — or similar. In this case, if you're interested in the neighbor's dog, you're searching by its specific tag, or — if you don't remember its name — a search for "BySubject::Animals::Dogs" might help you. Any such search will also keep the other "Amsterdam" results away.
The problem with tags is how exactly do you implement them. Your project on Amsterdam street may have begun in 2021, but still ongoing in 2022 with no end in sight; or you may have forgotten its dates at all. Additionally, "MyProjects::ByLocation::MyCity::AmsterdamStreet" is not an invalid way to tag that project.
E.g. the "javascript" tag implies the "programming" tag. I can even speculate there probably is a trait (linguists may suggest) which applies to some programming languages as well as to some spoken languages. This way tagging arguably can become even harder than taxonomy.
While a label is just a label.