Source: doctor.
Source: doctor.
Is that not true?
That's not what patients pay - that's the total allowable reimbursement to the doc via medicare.
I use medicare numbers here because almost all private insurers negotiate as %medicare. If I'm a hot specialty people are willing to pick an insurance plan over (say, cardiology) and there's a shortage of my folks in the area, I might negotiate up to something like 110-120% of medicare. Most of the time I'll be happy to get 105% medicare, and some folks will end up getting something like 95% of medicare.
To hit $1300 there'd have to be:
-A procedure, likely an inpatient or facility service, such as a small outpatient surgery, or an infusion. - Your doc has an in-house blood work lab and your insurer doesn't cover it, and the bill is actually a lab work bill
That latter bit is a gray area - it's actually barred under the Stark Law, as clinical lab work is considered a Designated Health Service that's barred from self-referral, if it's a third-party lab that they own or co-own. If it's their own actual in-clinic lab, though, I'm unsure of how that works out (I don't run my own lab, so I just know of this second-hand).
If you have a private-information-redacted copy of a 'normal' bill for $1300, I'd be happy to eyeball it - either to let you know something is off and worth appealing, or to learn something new for my self.
I was clarifying what arkades claimed, which I interpreted as the EOB does not state the true remuneration for the healthcare provider.
Sorry for the confusion. I stated the EOB to hopefully clarify that. Assuming that they got even 90% of that the doctor would be pushing $200+/hr. just to take my temperature.