> Many lawyers in America still use WordPerfect, and I suspect Corel still makes and updates it for that reason :-)
IIRC, that's because Word can't do footnotes (or something like that) the way lawyers need to do them, but WordPerfect can.
IIRC, that's because Word can't do footnotes (or something like that) the way lawyers need to do them, but WordPerfect can.
The only court I know that is truly finicky about formatting is the US Supreme Court, but they have sensible rules, like requiring Century, and book-width lines for actual readability.
Are those rules published somewhere?