> This would be the reaction of most professional ethologists as well.
A behaviorist maybe, but an ethologist?
* an ethologist surely knows that gene mutations can be advantageous for the family/group as well as the individual
* an ethologist surely knows that a previous advantage for survival can persist as a vestige
* an ethologist can surely rinse and repeat to find all kinds of fascinating combinations in living organisms which-- while they may not disadvantage the organism-- cannot be explained in the present as construing any clear survival advantage
Those alone are enough to develop an incremental path out of the narrow rational view that Graeber ascribes to Ethology's history. I can't imagine Ethology didn't already get there.
Ethologists: what say you?
Edit: Related process in an unrelated field-- early 20th Century German comparitive musicology eventually became the perfectly reasonable and relativist field of Ethnomusicology. AFAICT Ethnomusicologists kept the instrument taxonomy and the ethnologies, and then got off the "gold standard" of high-Romantic German art music. :)