Well, I just popped an inocuous search term ("dinosaurs") in there and the very first result was a page with the title:
"Evidence That Humans And Dinosaurs Coexisted"
So that actually kind of sucks.
"Evidence That Humans And Dinosaurs Coexisted"
So that actually kind of sucks.
I don't see what sucks - we're talking about the WWW here, and we should expect the full spectrum of thoughts and opinions. Unless you're hoping that each and every boutique search engine will filter the results according to your preference?
"Dinosaurs" and "my old book says the world is only a few thousand years old, therefore I'm going to try to convince you that carbon dating is invalid by hand-waving my way to the conclusion that Dinosaurs and humans existed at the same time" is a bit of a stretch. I'd expect maybe "Triceratops" as a result near the top, for example.
As to your demand that I calm down, again, you're trying too hard.
the thing about artisans, is that they create according to their specific taste, which may or may not intersect with subjective modern tastes. :)
"vaccines" and "covid 19" had decent results, mostly people's blogs and some sites trying to prevent misinformation.
"abortions" mostly gave statistics, a blog by a 14-year old student in China, and an extensive collection of writings in support of Ayn Rand and against Noam Chomsky.
"trump" gives the most perplexing results, which I don't really know how to describe. Interestingly, the Rand/Chomsky page shows up here too.
I suppose it depends on your definition of suckless, but all the sites that were returned were lightweight, and content-first. As for the content... interesting might be the word I'd use. And it definitely doesn't show up in mainstream engines.
i love it