It’s interesting that moral and social burden is somehow put onto people that don’t want to be tracked/shadow profiled/spied on, and NOT on the companies that do tracking/spying.
But they don't, they let me in despite me being very clear that I am entering on the condition that they don't track me, so here we are. They don't get to pull the surprised-face card when I then proceed to not let them track me.
Adjacent to that, I think a "I'm not going to display your ads" or bluntly "don't show me ads" header would make perfect sense and yet I'm quite sure that webmasters would treat it the exact same way that they've treated do-not-track.
HN lets you see who wrote a comment - it says above each one.
> If that’s not putting moral and social burden onto tracking blockers, I don’t know what is.
I mean you don't have a burden to visit their website if you don't want to. If it was a government organisation then yes.