Always wondered what people put in there and if the state even did anything about it (audited people).
I guess they could ask Amazon for records (threatening a lawsuit) and cross-reference with all the reported taxes based on name and address. If user bought just from Amazon more than what they reported they they have obviously owe some money + fines & late fees.
(But I suppose I am making gross assumptions about the competence and general technical abilities of my state's tax collecting office).
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/10/judge-blocks...
First it was anonymous purchase data. Then NC demanded user names and addresses but Amazon fought on 1st Amendment grounds and seems to have won:
“The First Amendment protects a buyer from having the expressive content of her purchase of books, music, and audiovisual materials disclosed to the government,”
I wonder if this was Zappos for example. What would have been the ruling.