He may understand law well, but not code and AI. I didn't see the author address that licensed code could be spit out, in large unedited chunks, by Copilot. I would expect that to be brought up as well as discussion about how much code needs to be copied to become a license violation. Also, while most of the article was pretty digestible by a layman, he only mentioned "fair use" but didn't give a definition of it. And while something may be "fair use" for copilot, what about the user who then uses that code? His comparison to Google getting sued for scanning books to provide search didn't really fit well.