I mean... it is, isn't it?
Google is specifically known to be using their fonts for tracking users across the web.
Google is specifically known to be using their fonts for tracking users across the web.
The interesting thing specifically about the fonts case is that, unlike other privacy regulation that defines only fines, and not compensation/damages (fines are levied by the data protection authorities). However in the font case there was a precedent that awarded damages to the claimant in the tune of 500€. Now we see a wave of ambulance chasing lawyers exploiting this ruling to shake up companies. Sad, but potentially useful for privacy. IANAL and all that jazz.
I mean... is it?