that’s like saying “good murder is different than bad murder” —
adding an adjective doesn’t actually change what it is, nor the morality around it
Some forms of eugenics are routinely practised in the West already. For example, pretty much every IVF clinic out there will recommend patients to scrap embryos that are proven to be aneuploid. (So either not viable, or, in some cases, viable but with Down syndrome.) This is accepted everywhere I know and is considered a part of your reproductive rights.
How is this not "good eugenics"? How would you frame it as unethical?
E.g. giving all parents free genetic screening and genome correction for their fetuses if they wish it would be eugenics.