https://la.curbed.com/2015/11/30/9895842/how-much-parking-lo...
The air quality is particularly bad in LA too. If more people used WayMo EV’s there would be a noticeable difference.
https://www.nbclosangeles.com/local-2/report-says-la-has-mos...
Houston is ~64% streets and parking: https://oldurbanist.blogspot.com/2011/12/we-are-25-looking-a...
Surface parking: 21.3%
Garage parking: 3.7%”
Parking is 25%, which is a more apples to apples comparison. More garages in LA?
That would require more parking width than travel lane width on any given segment with parking (to account for areas where parking is not permitted plus intersections). Few streets have less travel width than parking. Many have a multiple.
Not sure about Houston, but that is the case in many dense US city-suburbs. They'll have two-way roads with parking on both sides, and the roads will be about three cars wide. The result is cars parked on both sides, with drivers sharing the middle lane for both directions of travel.
When you see someone driving towards you, it's a game of chicken to see who will temporarily pull off into a vacant parking spot. It seems to happen because the lots aren't big enough for 2-4 car garages and driveways.
And for our friends across the ponds, yes: US households really do demand space for at least 2-4 cars per family.
How come? A car's emissions shouldn't change drastically whether it has a driver or not.
Why do you believe that? These taxis will increase the number of vehicles on the road, because
> more people use autonomous vehicles
Those "more people" will be bus riders and the housebound, and extra trips by people who already use cars in one form or another. The latter's own cars will be parked somewhere. Everyone commutes at the same time of day, no-one wants to share with randos.
The amount of valuable land that widespread deployment of autonomous vehicles could unlock is just staggering. Not to mention the avoided costs of building undercover garages.
I'd never get inside a car!