Also, "no armed confrontation with police" and your last paragraph are disingenuous at best.
2) yes, it was an insurrection
3) .. but not an attack on the seat of federal government. Do you not see a difference? Did the Seattle protectors occupy the house of government and threaten to kill elected representatives? Did they contest a national election? Were they trying to alter government to install a specific candidate and party?
Note 2) I don't deny some qualities of equivalence. Some.