Also a reminder that the 3D scanning is still unchanged after 1 century. Odd...
- But why ? 1) Because it was the good solution ? Maybe....
2) Because no one has had the new-thing that will level up the way we do 3D scanning ? I hope so
Also a reminder that the 3D scanning is still unchanged after 1 century. Odd...
- But why ? 1) Because it was the good solution ? Maybe....
2) Because no one has had the new-thing that will level up the way we do 3D scanning ? I hope so
That is simply false. We have interactive games based on cheap costumer 3d scanners. [1] We have 3d scanners in our pockets. [2] We have 3d scanners which can scan millions of points per second from the environment for hundreds of meters of distance. [3]
But yeah, if we ignore all the things which changed, then it turns out everything is "still unchanged".
1: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kinect 2: https://www.techradar.com/news/what-is-a-lidar-scanner-the-i... 3: https://www.mapix.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/63-9378_Rev...
There isn't one way to do 3d scanning. Unless you mean any method that involves taking 1 or more pictures is the same method.