Russia 100% does, or else, if they where actually hitting military targets with these missiles they would of won the war by now.
Russia uses these terror strikes on civilians as a method of waging war, an attempt to get the enemy to surrender.
It's an act of terror, and just one of many war crimes Russia commits weekly.
Google it. It wasn't the Russians.
"Ukrainian officials also reported that at least 95% of the city had been destroyed during the fighting, largely by Russian bombardments"
"The United Nations stated it had confirmed the deaths of 1,348 civilians, but said the true death toll was likely thousands higher, and added that 90% of the city's residential buildings had been damaged or destroyed"
That seems unlikely. We know that the Ukrainians are launching hundreds of HIMARS rockets, drones, M777 artillery strikes, and more. Those weapons are stored _somewhere_, and its intelligence's job to find them.
When an ammo-dump blows up, we know what it looks like. The Russians are incapable of hitting ammo dumps (or unwilling). Either way, it just means that the Ukrainian military will continue to use HIMARS / M777 artillery to push the front line further.
At a minimum, if these attacks were truly "successful", then the HIMARS / M777 attacks would stop. But... they won't. Its blatantly obvious that Ukraine wasn't hiding their HIMARS in an open playground in Kyiv.
---------
So while Russia continues to attack dog-parks and universities, Ukraine continues to attack training centers, command posts, ammo dumps, and supply routes.
The difference is palpable. Its clear who is winning the war.
I'm not sure if there's a real response to these Russian terror attacks unfortunately. But Ukraine seems like they'll inevitably be able to recapture the land at this rate, if the Russians really have such crappy intelligence that they wasted these missiles on such unimportant targets.
USA won the Revolutionary War vs the British in 1776, while desperately asking / begging for aid from France. When the Soviets beat the Nazis on the Eastern front, they were also receiving gross amounts of aid / US Liberty ships to rebuild their stockpiles (from USA / Lend Lease program).
The question of winning vs losing can be determined by roughly the strength, and determination, of the armies involved. Indeed, weapon-shipments are an advantage in a war, not a disadvantage. Its pretty silly to suggest otherwise.
----------
The real measure of the strength of the armies can be seen in the front lines. Russia has a complete inability to do anything about HIMARS, and instead sends cruise missiles to Kyiv cause they're too stupid to find the HIMARS.
Around 100 cruise missiles, none of them hitting any of the 12 HIMARS that have caused them so much grief over the last 3 months.
------
This annexation of Ukrainian territory will be remembered just as the Reichskommissariat Ukraine was remembered. A temporary setback that ultimately cost the German Army everything. The war doesn't end because some leader somewhere makes a declaration. The war ends when the armies both decide to stop fighting.
There's nothing that Russia has done here that encourages the Ukrainian Army to give up.
I mean, aside from the masses realizing that the only sane response is to get out of Ukraine and go back into Russia.
Russia has the capability to end this by simply ending the war. Ukraine on the other hand, has no response but to defend itself from the bully next door. It is obvious that only Ukraine's military is holding Russia back, and the illegal annexation only proves Russia's colonial aims here.
We just gotta wait until the Russians realize how pathetic their army is, and that there is no military solutions available to the Russians here. That will take time unfortunately, but that's what we have to wait for.