I’m trying to understand this paragraph. In your mind, in what way does the one child policy make any of this hard to believe? How does that policy change our understanding of what’s going on in these camps?
I’m trying to understand this paragraph. In your mind, in what way does the one child policy make any of this hard to believe? How does that policy change our understanding of what’s going on in these camps?
They didn't, which mean they are fine having ethnic groups
The west is pushing this propaganda because it's a known fact that the US want to split the Chinese territory (Tibetan, Uighurs, Taiwanese) (same with Russia btw)
For the same reason they now, publicly announced, want to hinder China's development
https://www.channelnewsasia.com/asia/china-lashes-out-latest...
This is a gigantic leap to a conclusion that does not logically follow the premise, and ignores evidence that requires no such leaps.
I guess it was the inevitable that the Chinese propaganda machine would make its way to HN.
> They didn't, which mean they are fine having ethnic groups
Or, they just didn't deem the issue relevant enough to spend the resources to deal with it. China is a large country, some of those ethnic groups exist in remote locations, some very difficult to reach- it has been the case numerous times when a natural disaster occurred and aid was slow to reach those regions because of logistical difficulties.
Perhaps it wasn't that they are fine with the ethnic groups, but that they were indifferent and/or deemed them unimportant unless they had sufficient reason to think they warranted the attention/involvement.
Mind that just because they didn't want to lower their numbers, doesn't mean they have no issue with those groups, or that they wouldn't have issues with them if the situation and their perception of them changed.
That’s like saying “I understand you believe that the sky is pink.”
Hence she the US refers to it as strategic ambiguity. This is the same position that the likes of NZ and AU have.
So don’t go telling people they are uninformed when clearly you’re just here spreading propaganda.
Don’t forget that the CCP advocated for Taiwan independence, and during an interview Mao said they would help Taiwan (Formosa) in its struggle for independence. During a conference in Moscow in the 1920s they referred to Taiwan as an independent nation and nationality. This only changed in 1943.
There’s no long China history with China. When the Dutch went to Taiwan there was no presence of Ming dynasty. And at no point in history had china ever controlled or ruled over Taiwan. The CCP has never even set food in Taiwan.
So it literally has no valid claims to Taiwan. Regardless of any opinions you may hold.
If that’s splitting hairs then there’s no point in discussing because you obviously don’t care about history or facts and only regurgitate propaganda.