Can this actually be enforced. It sounds like it’s a Dutch court v US entity where they were a contractor. If the company had a Dutch entity they wouldn’t make such obvious errors in judgement as they’d know the local laws
If you'd read the second sentence of the article, you would have learned that the company has a branch in the Netherlands.
And if you kept reading you'd know they don't anymore and the guy hasn't been paid.
I read that and I don't think it contradicts my comment, as the firm had the Dutch entity and thus the knowledge of Dutch labour laws at the time of the firing. This is contrary to what the parent supposes.
Yeah, but it sounds like the NL subsidiary doesn't employ a NL lawyer; or maybe they do, but just don't listen to him.