A life full of pain and suffering is still a life. The alternative you're offering is not something without paid and suffering, it's worse. Notexisting is worse than pain and suffering.
A life full of pain and suffering is still a life. The alternative you're offering is not something without paid and suffering, it's worse. Notexisting is worse than pain and suffering.
That’s a stretch.
Far more important to come to terms with mortality than extend life indefinitely.
Is it even still living to have a heartbeat but with motor control, limited or no ability to speak, and no memory? Is “living” in this way best for the next of kin?
I found a recent episode of the Making Sense podcast in this topic to be thought provoking. You might give it a listen.
https://www.samharris.org/podcasts/making-sense-episodes/297...
Heck, I've had something as simple as bad food poisoning where, if it was a terminal symptom, I would have ended it.
I would never want anything other than comfort care for me or my family in that situation but the families religion dictated that we continue.