Most thought Zuck was a fool to pass on that. He 300x’d it in 10 years.
Most thought Zuck was a fool to pass on that. He 300x’d it in 10 years.
It sounds like many social media CEOs would agree that it's like getting punched in the stomach every day
He's had every chance to be a decent human being and he has rejected it.
Facebook has been a force for tremendous evil in the world, and now he's trying to push this bullshit proprietary metaverse crap on us, just because.
People hate him for who he is. He feels bad, and then continues doing the things that make us hate him, and that makes it worse.
You truly hate Mark Zuckerberg huh, you must live a great life
> many social media CEOs
"We experts of X recommend X."
It's not like he won't be a millionaire if he just owns a large part of Facebook instead of running it.
I don't understand your argument.
Here’s an article describing the effect radio had on the rise of Hitler: https://daily.jstor.org/an-affordable-radio-brought-nazi-pro...
A few years before these genocides, western media were praising Facebook for its role in the uprisings in the Middle East. It was seen as a force for good, allowing people to self organise against dictatorial regimes.
Hell, back in the day the printing press pretty much brought down all of the power structures at the time, because suddenly people had more free access to information.
It wasn’t even indifference, they actively undercut and mislead all of the supposed checks and balances they assured everyone were enough both internally and externally. When confronted they have lied to their internal teams, they have lied to lawmakers, they have lied to investors. It is always the same response. There is no room left to leave this as a “mistake that fell through the cracks”.
It’s a pattern of behaviour that now spans many years and many incidents. All it has shown is that they appear both incapable and unwilling of reform and should be treated as such.
The equivalent to snail mail is something like https, smtp or ssl, not FB.