Hacker News Reader

Hacker News

Comment by fny | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

fny

It actually depends on the size of the pot. There have been times where there was positive expectancy.

[0]: https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/saturday-fun-...

View on HN

But that still says you shouldn’t :D

> if you could afford to buy several hundred million tickets, the math says you should.

I mean, unless you happen to be filthy rich already.

The key to getting rich and staying rich is figuring out how to risk other people's money. If you want to buy millions of lottery tickets, or launch a startup, or start a poker career, or anything really, it's far better to do it without risking your own security. Let other people invest in your venture for a reasonable return if you succeed, but also make sure you some non-trivial amount of equity for yourself so you make a killing if it's wildly successful.

This is how most VC backed unicorns have worked. The early investors made a lot, but the founders who mostly only risked their time, energy, and opportunity-costed salary made far, far, far better returns.

The article is wrong. You should still play if there's positive expectancy and the money you spent won't be missed (i.e. you won't be ruined.)

See https://quantwolf.com/doc/powerball/powerball.html

If any expected value matters, it's utility, not wealth. If you think utility is linear in wealth, you need to check Jeff Bezos' instagram more.

My reading is different, it’s more "together with the kelly criterion or a weaker version of it, you can say it doesn’t matter if you do". This is still "eh maybe I’ll be lucky" and not "it’s mathematically sensible" because

> What it means is that you would have to play the game for thousands of years with the jackpot being greater than 117 million each time in order to realize a positive expected return.

Are you sure? That article ignores the chance of a split pot, and a positive EV lottery jackpot increases the odds of a split pot by motivating buyers.

What lottery was that?

Mega Millions (which is still in line with your first comment).

> [0] The probability of winning Mega Millions

It may still make sense to play even if your monetary ev is negative. Utility function doesn’t need to be linear.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com