Hacker News Reader

Comment by Der_Einzige | Hacker News Reader

We've asked you repeatedly to stop posting flamewar comments and you've continued to do it. If you keep this up we will ban you, so please stop.

https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html

Please renounce your moderatorship since you are obviously unable to correctly deduce what is a real argument and what is designed to cause flame wars.

I have no idea why people here fawn over your moderating. Please spare this website of anymore of it.

You’re very mistaken about what kind of hippies PNW folks are if you think they’ll happily give their water to Californians. They’re hippies, but surly ones with guns who don’t look kindly on capitalists who adopt liberalism as an affect. My wife, whose family were among the first settlers in Oregon, gets mad seeing Tillamook cheese in stores here in Maryland. (“That’s our cheese. Fuck you.”)

Capitalists are liberals, but there might be truth to what you said.

But they’re not “hippie liberals.” Oregonians are probably the most anti-capitalist and anti-industry (really, anti-economy) people in the country.

I think this gets closer to the point I tried to make. There is no unified "blue" or "red," so there wouldn't be a split along the colors cable news paints on election maps. Our FPTP system papers over a lot of diversity of thought that gets wrapped up under the big tents, but doesn't match geography. There are tankies in conservative-run states and evangelicals in Blue Country. Any attempt to split the country along ideological lines would make the most ridiculous gerrymandered district blush.

I think you're mixing up different things. You're correct that teams "blue" and "red" are actually coalitions of people who believe quite different things. But in part that's because of geographic and cultural commonalities that cut across party lines. Both Oregon Democrats and Oregon Republicans skew libertarian, because the state does. In Georgia, both Democrats and Republicans skew more religious.

A lot of the intractability of our national politics is because geographical and cultural differences are overlaid on top of normal political differences. Splitting the country up along geographic lines would allow us to just fight over politics, instead of over deep-rooted cultural patterns.

That's an easier position to take if you aren't one of the people who'd suffer worse religious persecution in a state unconstrained by the constitution. I would still be fighting against those deep-rooted cultural patterns, but I would be overrun quickly without support from enforcement of the 1st and 14th Amendments. State equivalents would be quickly discarded.

44% of the people in my home country think I should be executed due to my religious beliefs: https://assets.pewresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2....

But that's what their religion says and it is what it is. It would be wrong for someone else to come along and impose their own cultural patterns (such as secularism) for the sake of a minority. That's just imperialism.

They also are in a drought are they not? Virtually the entirety of the country west of Missouri is. And that’s only going to get worse and worse.

They may still have enough for their needs, but it’s unlikely they have enough for California’s needs, especially for its agriculture.

you realize most of the area by land in oregon and washington is very very red. and in a secession scenario they have a shitload more guns than the cities.

and even the parts that are less red probably wouldn't want to pipe the water down to cali latifundia. a lot of that area seems very culturally independent so i doubt they'd like being the breadbasket for something like the cali big cities.

and regardless yeah y'all do because population along the coast is very dense. you don't have enough space there to grow all that food for especially the big cali cities.

we don't need y'all, though.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com